Monthly Archives: July 2016

William Blake, “Eternity”

 

Eternity

He who binds to himself a joy
Does the winged life destroy
He who kisses the joy as it flies
Lives in eternity’s sunrise

— “Eternity” (1777) by William Blake (1757 – 1827), from the poet’s notebook

 

— posted by Roger W. Smith

   July 2016

“One year out”: A Criminal “Justice” System Run Amok

 

re:

One year out: On July 13, 2015, President Obama commuted the prison sentences of 46 nonviolent drug offenders. Here’s what their lives are like now.

The Washington Post

July 8, 2016

‘One Year Out’

 

*************************************************

From the introduction to the article:

President Obama granted clemency to 46 nonviolent drug offenders in July 2015.

Washington Post reporters and editors tracked down the individuals who received clemency and have recorded their stories in condensed form.

[President Obama] granted clemency to 46 nonviolent drug offenders last July [2015], many of whom were sentenced under laws that no  longer exist ….

More than 40 Post reporters and editors worked to track down the individuals who received clemency … and record their stories, which we present here in condensed form.

 

*************************************************

This article is highly pertinent in view of our insane sentencing policies.

I think it should be considered for a Pulitzer Prize.

It makes one feel and realize in very human terms how horrible the criminal “justice” system is and what its draconian sentences for petty crimes have done and are doing to people and their families.

Note that a preponderance of those incarcerated who have suffered horrible deprivation for victimless “crimes” are black.

Surprised?

 

— Roger W. Smith

   July 2016

 

*************************************************

In this great country, when a court makes a mistake, we like to believe that the system is just and corrections are available, but that’s not always the case. Don’t ever go to prison in this country — stay away from the criminal justice system. It is an industry out of control, with no one willing or able to tackle it and implement true, humane fairness and justice.

— John M. Wyatt, Las Cruces, N.M. (one of the ex-offenders granted clemency who are quoted in the article)

 

*************************************************

Addendum: the following are the charges — for victimless crimes — brought against and the sentences that were given to the 46 felons who were interviewed for the article:

life in prison for distribution of crack

60 months in prison for cultivation of marijuana plants; 20 years in prison for conspiracy to manufacture, distribute and possess with intent to distribute more than 1,000 marijuana plants

life in prison for possession and distribution of crack, and for aiding and abetting

180 months in prison for conspiracy to distribute in excess of 50 grams of crack, and for carrying a firearm in relation to a drug-trafficking crime

240 months in prison for possession with intent to distribute crack

240 months in prison for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and crack

240 months in prison for possession with intent to distribute crack

240 months in prison for conspiracy to distribute crack, and for possession with intent to distribute crack

292 months in prison for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and crack

240 months in prison for conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute a mixture and substance containing methamphetamine, possession with the intent to distribute a mixture and substance containing methamphetamine, use of a firearm during and in furtherance of a drug-trafficking crime, possession with the intent to distribute a mixture and substance containing cocaine, carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug-trafficking crime, and endeavoring to influence and impede the administration of justice

360 months in prison for conspiracy to violate narcotics laws

life in prison for possession with intent to distribute cocaine, and for possession with intent to distribute marijuana

life in prison for distribution of crack

life in prison for conspiracy to distribute cocaine and crack, and for distribution of crack

360 months in prison for distribution of cocaine

262 months in prison for possession with intent to distribute crack

life in prison for conspiracy to distribute and distribution of crack

262 months in prison for conspiracy to distribute crack

life in prison for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute, and for distribution of, cocaine and crack

240 months in prison for conspiracy to distribute, and for possession with intent to distribute, more than five kilograms of cocaine and more than 50 grams of crack

life in prison for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and conspiracy to distribute controlled substances

188 months in prison for distribution of crack

240 months in prison for possession with the intent to distribute crack

240 months in prison for conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute marijuana and cocaine, for use of a communication facility to facilitate the commission of a drug-trafficking offense, and for aiding and abetting

240 months in prison for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute, and for distribution of, five kilograms or more of cocaine and 50 grams or more of crack

262 months in prison for possession with intent to distribute marijuana

did Jim Brosnan use the spitball? (and, did he admit it?)

 

 

From: Roger W. Smith

To: Paul Aron

December 28, 2015

 

Dear Mr. Aron,

By chance, I recently discovered your book Did Babe Ruth Call His Shot? and Other Unsolved Mysteries of Baseball in the New York Public Library. I consider it a very lucky find.

I am reading the book now and enjoying it immensely. It is stimulating, informative, and very well researched. I have given copies as Christmas gifts to my two brothers.

The bibliographies at the end of each chapter are very well done, in my opinion.

I do have one correction to make that I think is in order. In Chapter 21, “Who Threw the Spitter?” you refer, in the bibliography at the end of the chapter, to Jim Brosnan’s book The Long Season (New York: Harper & Row, 1960).

I read the book in paperback around the time of its publication as an adolescent. It’s a great book, in my opinion, one of the best baseball books ever written. And to think it was written by Brosnan himself!

In your bibliography for Chapter 21, on page 169, you state: “… you have to wonder why he [Brosnan] never mentions a spitter, though he was frequently accused of throwing one.”

Brosnan, in fact, does mention throwing a spitter, his throwing one, that is.

On page 111 of my worn paperback edition of The Long Season ((New York: Dell Publishing Co., Inc., 1961), Brosnan writes (in his diary entry for April 20):

 I, personally, like to work on my spitball in the bullpen. The spitball is illegal, of course, although it’s quite popular in the National League. (Also, the International, Texas, Pacific Coast, and most other leagues I’ve worked in.) It’s not an easy pitch to control and requires constant practice. Most practitioners in the National, International, Texas. etc. leagues throw their spitballs most of the time they’re pitching. Many of them are quite successful, and I’ve often wished that I could get away with spitballs, myself. However, there’s a knack to it. I, personally, need a good stiff wind blowing straight out from the plate in order to get anything on the pitch.

 

*******************************************************

From Paul Aron

to: Roger W. Smith

December 28, 2015

 

Thank you for your kind words about Did Babe Ruth Call his Shot? Thanks also for pointing out my error. I also read (and loved) The Long Season as an adolescent, and I obviously didn’t re-read it carefully enough. I’m not sure the publisher has any plans to reprint the book, but I will alert them to the error and make sure that if there is a reprint the error is corrected.

Juno arrives at Jupiter; PBS virtually ignores it

 

Re tonight’s PBS Newshour program (July 5, 2016):

The hour long program contained the following segments:

Hillary Clinton email scandal (latest developments)

fighting in Eastern Ukraine

Iraq bombing death toll

Freddie Gray case (Baltimore)

 how much playtime should young students get?

 Harry Potter play

 Where, I ask, was – is — coverage of the arrival today at Jupiter of the Juno spacecraft?

This not a big story?

 

— Roger W. Smith

   July 5, 2016

“One Robber’s 3 Life Sentences”

 

This post concerns a story in The New York Times that may have been overlooked by many people, the story having been published on a holiday.

“One Robber’s 3 Life Sentences: ’90s Legacy Fills Prisons Today”

By Timothy Williams

The New York Times

July 4, 2016

It is another story about the absolute lunacy — the unfairness — of our “criminal justice” system. The sentence is ridiculous, cruel, uncalled for.

Justice is supposed to be applied rationally. It is supposed to be a system based on abstract principles which have been codified whereby people who let their passions and criminal instincts get the best of them are subject to “correction” by an ordered system in which the law is applied (supposedly) rationally, so that the person “out of control” (the criminal) is brought to heel by officials (judges, prosecutors, correction officers, and so on) who apply the law strictly, yet fairly and impartially.

The system is anything but fair or rational. It makes absolutely no sense.

There is no other way to put it.

Someday, someone is going to write a major work of literature – a new Les Misérables, a new House of the Dead, a new J’accuse – that will make the public feel the horror and injustice of all this.

But, I am sure that for the present this will not bother most people, including those who bother to read this blog, any more than did another recent post of mine:

Roger W. Smith, re: “British Man Sentenced to 40 Years in Al Qaeda Plot to Attack London Airport”

https://rogersgleanings.com/2016/05/29/roger-w-smith-re-british-man-sentenced-to-40-years-in-al-qaeda-plot-to-attack-london-airport/

No one seems to care.

 

— Roger W. Smith

   July 2016

 

*****************************************************

Addendum:

See the eloquent response to this blog by Vandy Singleton, below.

See also “Lenny Singleton’s Life Sentences”

 

letter to editor from Vandy Singleton

The New York Times

July 19, 2016

 

*****************************************************

email to Roger Smith from Vandy Singleton (Leonard Singleton’s wife)

July 20, 2016

 

Thank you, Roger, for this and your more lengthy reply online. I just thought it important to tell you that indeed someone does care and very much so. You are not alone in caring about humanity. Believe me I understand how frustrating it can be and sometimes it seems that I am on an island completely alone fighting for true equality and justice. But on this journey, I have found some — just a few — willing to fight the “good” fight with me. Again, thank you for posting a link to the article and for caring about Lenny’s situation.

Sincerely,

Vandy Singleton

Henry Miller and Sherwood Anderson

 

Henry Miller was a fervent admirer of Sherwood Anderson. The two writers met two or three times, briefly — according to Miller, “in the last year of his [Anderson’s] life.”

In a Paris Review interview, Miller said:

Of all the American writers that I have met, Sherwood Anderson stands out as the one I liked most. Dos Passos was a warm, wonderful chap, but Sherwood Anderson — well, I had been in love with his work, his style, his language, from the beginning. And I liked him as a man — although we were completely at loggerheads about most things, especially America. He loved America, he knew it intimately, he loved the people and everything about America. I was the contrary. But I loved to hear what he had to say about America.

“Henry Miller, The Art of Fiction,” interview by George Wickes, The Paris Review No. 28, Summer-Fall 1962

 http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/4597/the-art-of-fiction-no-28-henry-miller

 

******************************************************

In his impressionistic travelogue The Colossus of Maroussi, there is a passage by Miller about Anderson:

After the succulent repast at the taverna in Piraeus, … we moved back to the big square in Athens. It was midnight or a little after and the square was still crowded with people. Kastimbalis seemed to divine the spot where his friends were seated. We were introduced to his bosom comrades, George Seferaides and Captain Antoniou of the good ship “Acropolis.” They were soon plying me with questions about America and American writers. Like most educated Europeans they knew more about American literature than I ever will. Antoniou had been to America several times, had walked about the streets of New York, Boston, New Orleans, San Francisco and other ports. The thought of him walking about the streets of our big cities in bewilderment led me to broach the name of Sherwood Anderson whom I always think of as the one American writer of our time who has walked the streets of our American cites as a genuine poet. Since they scarcely knew his name, and since the conversation was already veering towards more familiar ground, namely Edgar Allen Poe, a subject I am weary of listening to, I suddenly became obsessed with the idea of selling them Sherwood Anderson. I began a monologue myself for a change – about writers who walk the streets in America and are not recognized until they are ready for the grave. I was so enthusiastic about the subject that I actually identified myself with Sherwood Anderson. He would probably have been astounded had he heard of the exploits I was crediting him with. I’ve always had a particular weakness for the author of “Many Marriages.” In my worst days in America he was the man who comforted me, by his writings. It was only the other day that I met him for the first time. I found no discrepancy between the man and the writer. I saw in him the born storyteller, the man who can make even the egg triumphant.

   As I say, I went on talking about Sherwood Anderson like a blue streak. It was to Capitan Antoniou that I chiefly addressed myself. I remember the look he gave me when I had finished, the look which said: “Sold. Wrap them up, I’ll take the whole set.” Many times since I’ve enjoyed the pleasure of rereading Sherwood Anderson through Antoniou’s eyes. Antoniou is constantly sailing from one island to another, writing his poems as he walks about strange cities at night. Once, a few months later, I met him for a few minutes one evening in the strange port of Herakleion in Crete. He was still thinking about Sherwood Anderson, though his talk was of cargoes and weather reports and water supplies. Once out to sea I could picture him going up to his cabin and, taking a little book from the rack, burying himself in the mysterious life of a nameless Ohio town. The night always made me a little envious of him, envious of his peace and solitude at sea. I envied him the islands he was stopping off at and the lonely walks through silent villages whose names mean nothing to us. To be a pilot was the first ambition I had ever voiced. I liked the idea of being alone in the little house above the deck, steering the ship over its perilous course. To be aware of the weather, to be in it, battling with it, meant everything to me. In Antoniou’s countenance there were always traces of the weather. And in Sherwood Anderson’s writing there are always traces of the weather. I like men who have the weather in their blood. ….

 — Henry Miller, The Colossus of Maroussi (New York: New Directions, 2010), pp. 31-32

 

— posted by Roger W. Smith

    July 2016

Acknowledgment: Thanks to Sherwood Anderson scholar Claire Bruyère for pointing out this passage to me.

my experience of erotic literature and banned books (mostly back when they were banned, and in my formative years)

 

There was a cheap mass market paperback book on the living room bookshelf in our house in Cambridge, Massachusetts in the 1950’s – I would guess it was my mother’s because she was the parent with literary tastes: a collection of short stories by Erskine Caldwell, a Southern writer who wrote about plain, simple people. He had a very simple, down to earth style.

I read one of the stories, “A Swell-Looking Girl,” when I was a preadolescent. It astounded me because of its frank content, telling an unvarnished story that – while the language was not crude – seemed to have shocking implications. I did not, however, view it as a bad piece of fiction. Even at that age, I had fairly good taste.

“A Swell-Looking Girl” is a very simple story about a young man in some town or other in the South who has just gotten married. He is very proud of his young bride and wants to show her off to his male neighbors. So he has her come out on the porch and then (eventually) lifts up her dress. She is nude underneath and completely exposed. The men all say “that sure is some swell looking girl” and gradually leave. That’s the whole story.

The story seemed remarkable to me at that age because of the thought of complete female nudity. It was kind of understated the way it was written, but very daring.

Another book on my parents’ bookshelf which I became aware of at a later age was James Joyce’s Ulysses. I was intrigued by it without reading it (which would have been quite difficult for me then; it still is now). I asked my mother and father about it once at the dinner table. I doubt they had read much of it, but they did explain to me the use by Joyce of stream of consciousness. This intrigued and interested me very much.

Later, when I was in high school, my church youth group, Liberal Religious Youth (LRY), had a midwinter conference at Proctor Academy in Andover, New Hampshire in which one of the workshops, which I attended, was on sexuality. In the flyer for the conference, in the place where there would be a description of the workshop, instead of a description of the workshop per se, it simply quoted the famous concluding words of Ulysses:

… I was a Flower of the mountain yes when I put the rose in my hair like the Andalusian girls used or shall I wear a red yes and how he kissed me under the Moorish Wall and I thought well as well him as another and then I asked him with my eyes to ask again yes and then he asked me would I yes to say yes my mountain flower and first I put my arms around him yes and drew him down to me so he could feel my breasts all perfume yes and his heart was going like mad and yes I said yes I will Yes.

This caused quite a stir. Some adults were alarmed. They already thought that these LRY conferences, with adolescents staying together away from home at a conference site with little or no supervision, were a de facto invitation to licentiousness.

My reaction to the Ulysses quote in the flyer was that this was powerful writing of a high order. It did not arouse prurient feelings in me.

Another erotic book that I became slightly acquainted with at around the same time (actually a bit later) was Lady Chatterley’s Lover. I knew of the book but hadn’t read it until my senior year in high school. That year I attended an LRY conference in some town in Massachusetts and was staying over the weekend in someone’s house. There was a paperback of Lady Chatterley’s Lover in my room and, during downtime on a Sunday morning, I read some of it.

I grew to like and admire D. H. Lawrence; yet, I like several of his other novels (particularly The Rainbow and Sons and Lovers) a lot more than Lady Chatterley’s Lover. Nevertheless, when I first read it (parts of it, the “good parts”), I was favorably impressed. It was my first exposure to Lawrence. And, the sexual language and sexual descriptions were new to me. It gave me a desire for sex and got me thinking about it in more explicit terms. Yet, I knew it was not just a “dirty” book.

In my late high school years, I read Henry Miller’s Tropic of Capricorn in a recently published Grove Press paperback with a bright red cover, which I found in my father’s bedroom — the obscenity ban had just been lifted by the courts. I had never heard of Miller.

At first, I noticed the sexy parts – there were lots of them. The “good parts” were explicit, more so than other naughty books that I had hitherto peeked at. Besides being erotic, they were well written, amusing, and fun.

Soon — very quickly — I got caught up in the whole book and in Miller’s narrative style and I was no longer interested in the sexy parts alone. And, I found that I enjoyed the sex scenes not only for their explicit erotic content, but also for the humor and the good, zesty writing.

Tropic of Capricorn is one of my favorite books and I think it deserves the status of an American literary classic.

While in college, I also read Miller’s Sexus and Plexus and, later, books such as Quiet Days in Clichy and The World of Sex. I enjoyed them all and came to have admiration for Miller as a writer.

My father’s book collection included Memoirs of Hecate County, a novel by the famous literary critic Edmund Wilson. The book was banned in the US until 1959. I read one graphic sex scene in my father’s copy. I didn’t like it. It was too clinical, like an automaton detached from the protagonist’s persona is engaging in sexual intercourse. I find aspects of Wilson’s personality unappealing and don’t particularly care for his writing.

Peyton Place (1956) was a book that was around in those days. It was a phenomenal best seller and was published in a paperback with a black cover that seemed to promise, here is a BAD book. We didn’t have a copy in our house, but a lot of people did. There were a few naughty scenes, but I am sure the book would seem tame now.

The Carpetbaggers (1961) was a bestseller by Harold Robbins. We didn’t have a copy at home, but several kids I knew in high school called my attention to it. I think that it was one particular scene that caused most of the excitement. A girl is at the top of the stairs in a house, naked; she spills orange soda on herself and carries on in a provocative fashion. It was titillating for an adolescent, but I had no interest in reading the book.

Harold Robbins was a trashy writer who sold out. But, in my adult years, I did read an early novel of his, A Stone for Danny Fisher (1952), written when he still had some integrity as a striving writer. I was able to purchase a rare copy. Surprisingly, it was a pretty good book, a piece of realism about a young Jewish man who struggles to make his way during the Depression.

Another book that I discovered on what used to be the erotic books table in bookstores in the sixties – when I was in my young twenties — was My Life and Loves by Frank Harris. He was a successful editor in New York who had countless sexual conquests. Recently, I saw a handsome paperback reissue of the book on one of the bargain tables at the Strand Bookstore in New York and examined the book again. The book is a frank autobiography that was privately published by the author during the 1920’s and was published thereafter by the Obelisk Press in Paris (Henry Miller’s first publisher) in 1931. It is incredibly explicit and details one sexual encounter after another, with Harris portrayed as being remarkably potent and the women portrayed as ravenous for sex.

I can’t quite account for the fact that I found it, as I did at the later date, to be boring and tedious. After a few pages, you feel compelled to put it down. It’s like the case with pornography. The detail quickly becomes repetitive and mind-numbing.

George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four is another book I should mention, although no one nowadays would categorize it as a “dirty” book. When I was in high school in the early 1960’s, however, things were different.

Nineteen Eighty-Four can hold its own not just as a polemic, so to speak, but also as a literary work. It took me several readings to appreciate this. After several readings, I grew to appreciate what I consider to be the brilliant satire more fully. I think that Nineteen Eighty-Four bears comparison to an even greater work, Johnathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels. Both works are brilliant pieces of satire.

Nineteen Eighty-Four is not pornographic. But, there are a couple of sex scenes involving the protagonist, Winston Smith, and Julia, “the girl from the fiction department.” The scene (and the line) that I remember best from reading the novel as an adolescent – it seemed to be what all my fellow teenagers noticed — was the scene when they first make love and Winston “felt at the zipper of her overalls.”

Because the book contained two sex scenes, it was banned in our high school (Canton High School in Canton, Massachusetts). I did read it, however, as part of Dr. Erwin Gaines’s reading group. Dr. Gaines was a high ranking librarian in Boston who had instituted an extra-curricular reading group for high school students. We would meet at his home every two weeks or so during the school year to discuss books; it was very enjoyable and stimulating. I am glad that I got to read Nineteen Eighty-Four then and didn’t have to wait until later.

 

— Roger W. Smith

   July 2016