Monthly Archives: December 2017

Mozart’s “Jupiter” live (thoughts inspired by)

 

Last night I saw a performance of Mozart’s symphony no. 41 in C Major (“Jupiter”) by the Orpheus Chamber Orchestra at Carnegie Hall.

I dashed off my thoughts last night during intermission and on the subway and bus home. The following notes of mine were written on the fly.

*****************************************************

The “Jupiter” symphony. Probably not my personal favorite.

I love the “Linz,” no. 36, a personal favorite of my Mom; and no. 40 in G major, a personal favorite of my father and mother, an early favorite of mine from around age six.

The “Jupiter”: Awesome. Magnificently, brilliantly constructed. Such power. Such “musical intellect” (aka genius).

*****************************************************

With Mozart, the music seems to be coming from somewhere else, from a celestial source, from the spheres — not from the quill pen of a living, breathing composer hunched over a sheet of parchment.

Regarding the preternatural quality of Mozart’s music: He developed musical knowledge and virtuosity at such a young age. Almost simultaneously with the development of consciousness. Not long after developing the ability to talk. So that his brain must have been “wired” musically.

He could, I would imagine, think musically the way you and I run thoughts through our heads and take doing so — being able to cogitate in the form of thoughts which take the shape of words and sentences — for granted

His music almost seems to take shape naturally, effortlessly — like breathing — the way our thoughts form in our brains and take shape as sentences and paragraphs without our thinking much of or about it.

The third movement of the “Jupiter” symphony (Menuetto: Allegretto) begins with a theme that seems to have originated in the deep “musical subconscious.”

*****************************************************

Another fact which occurred to me while listening to the “Jupiter” symphony. It’s something that is fully applicable to a composer like Mozart, whom I have just been describing as “otherworldly.”

What a difference hearing instruments live makes.

Music is music. It’s sound, not a math problem.

The acoustics. Vibrations. Timbre. Loudness when called for.

The first movement of the “Jupiter” symphony was played loud. As it should be.

Not tinny.

Loud strings, blaring horns, percussion.

The strings sure do a lot of work, pull their weight.

You appreciate the various instruments heard live. On a recording, sometimes it’s a mishmash.

*****************************************************

I emailed my thoughts to friends and relatives.

My older brother wrote: “I’m always jealous of such genius — people who are born with innate abilities amaze me, Mozart more than just about anyone else.”

I replied:

In my case, the ability to recognize it extends to writers and composers; I am out of my depth in other fields, such as painting and sculpture or science.

Apropos this — or perhaps apropos nothing — the film “Amadeus” presented Mozart as a characterization of genius: a cartoon character. Things were made up out of whole cloth, such as his relationship with Salieri and the circumstances of the composition of his Requiem. (“Wolfie’s” wife was also a ridiculous character worthy of “The Honeymooners.”)

*****************************************************

The Orpheus Chamber Orchestra will be performing Mozart’s symphony no. 40 in February.

 

— Roger W. Smith

  December 8, 2017

can the sun “grin”?

 

I learned in yesterday’s New York Times about the passing of my former journalism professor Maurice (Mickey) Carroll, who died on December 6th.

“Maurice Carroll, Political Reporter and Pollster, Dies at 86”

By Sam Roberts

The New York Times, December 6, 2017

 

*****************************************************

Mickey Carroll was a tough, dapper Irish guy and an outstanding reporter on the Times’s city desk for many years. He taught me far more about writing than any of my other journalism profs; it wasn’t even close.

It’s a truism that the best way to learn any skill is to do it. Well, besides lecturing, Carroll meticulously critiqued our writing (stories we had to report and write as class assignments).

I would hand in a story to him. I remember one was when he let the class interview him press conference style and we were assigned to write a profile of him. “This is very good,” he said to me, handing back the paper a day or two later, “but it’s too long.”

I kept tightening up my work. I began to appreciate how important space limitations are in a newspaper. For a feature article, it’s usually six hundred words. Six hundred words meant just that: six hundred words. If you wrote, say, 615 words, your editor would be unhappy, having to do the work himself of excising a “graf” from your story.

I would hand in papers that I thought were as carefully and tightly constructed as I could make them, with no superfluous words. They would come back with red lines drawn though maybe ten or fifteen words or phrases that I had never realized were superfluous. A “that,” say, where it could be dispensed with.

 

*****************************************************

Professor (and seasoned reporter) Carroll told us a funny story in class one day which illustrates the frustrations he himself had experienced as a writer. He finally left the Times for another paper. He said the final straw was when he once assigned to cover the St. Patrick’s Day parade in Manhattan.

The lead sentence in the story he turned in was “The sun grinned on the Irish yesterday.”

“Grinned” was too colorful a word for the copy editor at the Times, which was known for bloodless prose. (It still is, but efforts have made over recent years to make the writing more lively.) For “grinned,” the copy editor substituted some more generic verb.

“That did it,” Mickey said.

I could identify with the frustrations he felt with pettifogging editors.

 

— Roger W. Smith

  December 7, 2017

 

*****************************************************

Addendum: Sam Roberts, one of the Times’s best obituary writers, and an outstanding writer in general, wrote the obituary. He notes: “Known to be cranky but easily amused, Mr. Carroll would often pepper his reporting with wry and iconoclastic asides.” That’s how he was in class: the teacher/editor who applied principles of “tough love” to improving the writing of his students, while doing it with wit and grace. And, he showed us how, while adhering to strict standards of newspaper writing, you could also have fun and work in a quip or an amusing detail or two. Shoehorn it in, that is, word length permitting.

“He never lost his reporter’s perspective, though, advising would-be journalists never to take themselves too seriously, no matter how important the news they’re covering may be,” Sam Roberts writes.

I found this to be true. He was a complete professional, and, as such, he was never out of character in class, yet he himself was a character.

He stressed that his vocation was that of REPORTER, and he once told a story to illustrate what that meant.

Early in Carroll’s career, a reporter on the Times’s arts desk, a cultural critic, was somewhere in Manhattan at some event or performance one evening. As he was leaving, he observed that a big fire had broken out in a building across the street. He telephoned the Times from a pay phone, shouting, “Get a reporter here immediately! There’s a fire!”

He was a reporter,” observed Carroll, who happened to be at Dallas Police Headquarters on one of his first reporting assignments when Lee Harvey Oswald was shot by Jack Ruby. “He was there. He should have covered the fire.”

the Water Music; thoughts about death

 

Last night, on December 2, 2017, I attended a concert by the Orpheus Chamber Orchestra at Carnegie Hall in New York.

The concert began with Handel’s Water Music Suite No. 2 in D Major.

It is good when hearing a musical composition such as the Water Music to see the actual players and how they are arranged on the stage. The horn player — essential to the piece — was at the rear, almost hidden behind the other musicians. The same players, pretty much, in the same arrangement, must have been performing on a barge in the first performance of the Water Music on July 17, 1717. The piece came through so strongly during last night’s performance, so convincingly, just as it must have three hundred years ago.

There was no conductor!

 

*****************************************************

The second work on the program was Shostakovich’s Cello Concerto No. 1 in E-flat Major. It is the first of two cello concertos that Shostakovich composed for the great Soviet cellist Mstislav Rostropovich. What impresses me most, as shown in this work, is the “drive” and energy and the “forward motion” of Shostakovich’s music, which in effect propels the listener along.

The first movement opens with and is built upon a four-note motif from which the piece evolves, just as is the case with Beethoven’s fifth symphony, which opens with a famous four-note motif. It is quite likely that Shostakovich had Beethoven in mind. He is supremely innovative, very modern and often avant-garde, yet at the same time he is, paradoxically, very mindful of composers of the past.

I did not realize that Shostakovich’s two cello concertos were written so late in his career. The Cello Concerto No. 1 was first performed in 1959.

 

*****************************************************

I have been reading a book about Walt Whitman and his views of death as revealed in his poetry: So Long!: Walt Whitman’s Poetry of Death by Harold Aspiz.

I have been reading the book for several weeks — it seems like I’m never going to finish it.

It often takes me a long time to complete books. I plod along, sometimes reading only a page or two before stopping. I mull over passages and often stop to read them a second or third time and digest them after chewing over a passage and pausing to think.

 

*****************************************************

Whitman’s views were continually evolving. He tried to reconcile them. He feared death. He often pretended not to, said (not ingenuously) that he welcomed it.

The author of the book about Whitman I am reading, Harold Aspiz, states:

Although he was acquainted with many of the scientific and religious movements of his age, Whitman could not accept the prevailing secular theories concerning death or those advocated by established religion. He viewed death as an eternal and benign mystery. … At times his poems approach death gladly, as if to embrace it; at times they treat it quizzically, revealing an uncertainty about his own assumptions.

I fear death. I don’t think about it all the time, but I fear it.

I was thinking during the concert of Handel in this connection, and by extension, of all art. It seems to be one way to transcend death, to become “immortal,” to live beyond one’s physical demise. The Water Music has not died, is not desiccated; it lives on in our hearing.

But there other ways to live on: in people’s memories.

Can you suggest other ways? It would be a comfort to be able to contemplate them.

 

*****************************************************

There were over 600 students in the balcony, attending the concert free as guests of the orchestra. They clapped between each movement, a no-no. I forgive them!

 

— Roger W. Smith

   December 3, 2017