why is Samuel Johnson still read? (or, why should he be?)

 

‘The Conversations of Dr. Johnson’ – Preface

 

“Few now read the many letters of Dr. Johnson. None at all, it is fairly safe to say, read the analyses of his books and the lists of variant readings. … that for which every reader turns to is Boswell. …

“It is only by his conversations that Johnson is now remembered.*

“Macaulay* many years ago commented upon [Johnson’s] ‘singular destiny—to be regarded in his own age as a classic, and in ours as a companion.’ His Dictionary has long ago been superseded, his Shakespeare is never consulted, very few people open the files of The Rambler or The Idler, his verse is neglected, Rasselas unread, and it is chiefly students who still turn to his Lives of the Poets.”

— Raymond Postgate, Preface to The Conversations of Dr. Johnson: Extracted from the Life by James Boswell (New York Taplinger Publishing Company, 1930)

*In his Life of Johnson.

 

*****************************************************

This is completely erroneous — from the perspective of today. But it reflects a common view of Johnson that prevailed until not that long ago — I would say into the 1980s or 90s.

Publication of the Yele Edition of Johnson’s works (now in its twentieth volume) has helped. And — most importantly — biographies and studies by writers such as James L. Clifford, W. Jackson Bate, and Donald Greene.

When I began reading Johnson, along with Boswell, in depth, I had discussions about him with my therapist, Dr. Ralph Colp Jr.

Dr. Colp had belonged to a book club in the past where, presumably, the book under discussion was Boswell’s Life of Johnosn. Reacting to my comments about Johnson — I believe I was reading the essays then — he said that a member of the discussion group had said, “The only reason Dr. Johnson is of any interest nowadays is because of Boswell,”

“I guess he was wrong,” Dr Colp said.

I told Dr. Colp that the best thing about Boswell’s Life was the conversations: Johnson’s. They are indeed marvelous. But I can attest, having read many of the essays and other works, that Johnson himself — his works, that is — is very much worth reading, for writers as well as scholars.

 

— posted by Roger W. Smith

   November 2023

 

selected works of Samuel Johnson in my library

 

 

2 thoughts on “why is Samuel Johnson still read? (or, why should he be?)

  1. Pete Smith

    For your information, I took two courses with W. Jackson Bate at Harvard — he was a great professor, though I don’t remember much about his commentary on Johnson then.

  2. Roger W. Smith Post author

    Yes, I remember you telling me that, although I didn’t realize it was two courses. Wasn’t one of the courses entitled “The Age of Johnson”? Bate’s biography — I think I read it more than once — is magnificent. Probably the best modern one. It is scrupulously researched and very well written. I believe it was the work of a lifetime.

Leave a ReplyCancel reply