a pregnant thought




conveyed to me by a long time friend in a phone conversation this morning

he was quoting a statement made by a philosophy professor in a college class he was enrolled in many years ago

the statement, as paraphrased by my friend: the question is not whether a philosophy or belief system is TRUE, it’s whether you like it nor not; does it appeal to you, say something to you? … the same thing applies to art [in the broad sense of the word]

my friend was wresting with religious doubts at the time; his professor’s statement was a consolation and revelation to him … what I would say, to the extent I understand, “translating” my friend’s inferences as best as I can, is that one can believe, engage with, bow to genius and inspiration (and, yes, truth!) without fear of being ridiculed for stupidity and credulity because something hasn’t been scientifically proved or some assertion or other has been disputed

a thought of my own: this statement has wide ranging implications … think of all the narrow minded, benighted people who want to find fault with art because they DISAGREE with something or other; to dissect, eviscerate it because they feel it is not CORRECT



— Roger W. Smith

   July 13, 2017

About Roger W. Smith

Roger W. Smith is a writer and independent scholar based in New York City. His experience includes freelance writing and editing, business writing, book reviewing, and the teaching of writing and literature as an adjunct professor. Mr. Smith's interests include personal essays and opinion pieces; American and world literature; culture, especially books and reading; classical music; current issues that involve social, moral, and philosophical views; and experiences of daily living from a ground level perspective. Besides (1) rogersgleanings.com, a personal site, he also hosts websites devoted to (2) the author Theodore Dreiser and (3) to the sociologist and social philosopher Pitirim A. Sorokin.
This entry was posted in aesthetics, general interest, personal views of Roger W. Smith, political correctness (PC) and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to a pregnant thought

  1. I could not agree more with that statement. I would even say further: if a philosophy is liked; if it appeals to somebody; if it says something to somebody, then it is True — to them at least. This sounds, of course, very near to William James’ Pragmatism (which I have always liked and, thus, adhered to).

  2. a brilliant and insightful comment, Li … thank you … always appreciate your comments

    thanks a lot for mentioning William James … have not read “Pragmatism” … I am going to do so … thanks again

  3. Heartfelt thanks to you for you kind compliment, Roger

    Regarding this work by W. James, it’s just brilliant, like most books he wrote. He and his brother (and perhaps he more than Henry) were blessed with some frightening intelligence.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s